It is currently Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:56 pm

All times are UTC



Welcome
Welcome to chefknivestogo

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!





 Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tanaka Sekiso 240 v. Richmond Damascus
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:02 pm 

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:33 pm
Posts: 87
I know the Damascus jsut became available and they are in slightly different price catagories but I'm, hoping to get some input on folks thoughts on these two knives in terms of size, shape, and performance.

Josh


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tanaka Sekiso 240 v. Richmond Damascus
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:27 pm 
Forum Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:13 pm
Posts: 2663
Location: CT
Well, one is stainless (Richmond) and the Tanaka is Carbon. I have the Tanaka 240mm and love it. It has a nice convex grind to it and slices very well. Just the right size for me! Can't really comment about the Richmond Damascus, but they look pretty dang nice!


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tanaka Sekiso 240 v. Richmond Damascus
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:49 pm 

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:33 pm
Posts: 87
Yeah I'm sold on the Tanaka but the new damascus looks damn nice. Just hoping someone had a hands on.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tanaka Sekiso 240 v. Richmond Damascus
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:03 pm 
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:34 pm
Posts: 1419
Okay, I've had hands on 1 Tanaka damascus, so here's my analysis (from memory)

The Richmond weighs slightly more, which makes it a slightly better cutter. Both are thin behind the edge, but Tanaka is slightly thinner overall. Grind on Richmond is convex, and very nice. The steel holds a good edge for stainless, takes a really fine edge, and has good toughness for such a thin edge.



_________________
Shaun Fernandez

With great sharpness comes great responsibility.
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tanaka Sekiso 240 v. Richmond Damascus
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:48 am 

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:33 pm
Posts: 87
Talked with Mark today and am going to give the Damascus a try once the get in from being handled. I'm not a big Damascus fan normally but this blade looks really nice. Figured I could always go back and get a Tanaka.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Nbles and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


suspicion-preferred