It is currently Fri Aug 18, 2017 6:08 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Welcome to chefknivestogo

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Kanehiro Ginsan
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:57 pm 

Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 7:48 pm
Posts: 3
Hi Mark,

I like my Kanehiro AS 240 so much, and I was excited to see they now had a knife in Ginsan. Can you tell me how the geometry and profile compare to the AS? More or less the same profile? Is it any thicker or the same?

Also how does sharpening Ginsan compare to AS? AS is pretty much my favorite for holding an edge and being fairly easy to sharpen. I am finding the M390 knife a bit of a bear to sharpen.


 Post subject: Re: Kanehiro Ginsan
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:09 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:18 pm
Posts: 10864
Location: Madison Wisconsin
Hi Jeff,

They look and feel the same in terms of profile and thickness. Ginsan is easier to sharpen compared to M390.

Mark Richmond
Visit our New Forum! Chefknivestogoforums
Chefknivestogo on Facebook
Chefknivestogo on Instagram
 Post subject: Re: Kanehiro Ginsan
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:26 am 
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:36 pm
Posts: 3330
Never sharpened M390, so can't comment on that one directly.

However, between AS and Ginsanko....AS has always been a bit more difficult to sharpen.

For me, there are two sharpening difficult it is to grind and how difficult burr removal is. Both AS and Ginsan are relatively easy to grind. However, AS is more alloyed and it seems like I always draw a correlation between how highly alloyed a steel is an how hard burr removal is. Simple carbons and simple stainless steels always seem to be easier to remove burrs on. Maybe blind luck or placebo effect too.

Carbon - 0.95%
Chromium: 13.00 – 14.50%
Manganese: .60 – 1.00%
Phosphorus: .030%
Sulfur: .020%
Silicon: .35%

Carbon: 1.40 – 1.50%
Tungsten: 2.00 – 2.50%
Vanadium: .30 - .50%
Chromium: .30 - .50%
Molybdenum: .30 - .50%
Manganese: .20 - .30%
Phosphorus: .025%
Sulfur: .004%
Silicon: .10 - .20%


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: